Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked7
VS
Black olives, canned
Black olives, canned1

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided

Amaranth leaves, cooked: 100 g · Black olives, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Black olives, canned for more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    81 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN2.11 g
    0.97 g
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    5.61 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    6.87 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    0.91 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN257 mg
    735 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    9 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    94 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.26 mg
    3.32 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    4 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    1.5 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Black olives, canned · Foodatron