Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked5
VS
Collard greens, cooked
Collard greens, cooked2

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Amaranth leaves, cooked: 100 g · Collard greens, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Collard greens, cooked for more protein and less sodium.

Evenly matched on saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    33 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.11 g
    2.71 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    5.65 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    4 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.4 g
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.72 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    0.05 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    257 mg
    15 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    117 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    141 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    1.13 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    21 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    18.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.