Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked5
VS
Collards, frozen, cooked
Collards, frozen, cooked3

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Collards, frozen, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    36 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.11 g
    2.97 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    7.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.57 g
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.41 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    0.04 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN257 mg
    286 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    251 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    209 mg
    210 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    1.12 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    26.4 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Collards, frozen, cooked · Foodatron