Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked7
VS
Dandelion greens, cooked
Dandelion greens, cooked0

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    33 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN2.11 g
    2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    6.4 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.62 g
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN257 mg
    280 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    232 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    140 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    1.8 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    24 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    18 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Dandelion greens, cooked · Foodatron