Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked4
VS
Epazote, raw
Epazote, raw3

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Amaranth leaves, cooked: 100 g · Epazote, raw: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Epazote, raw for less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    32 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN2.11 g
    0.33 g
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    7.44 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    3.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.52 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    257 mg
    43 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    633 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    209 mg
    275 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    1.88 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    55 mg
    121 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    3.6 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Epazote, raw · Foodatron