Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked6
VS
Hearts of palm, canned
Hearts of palm, canned2

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided

Amaranth leaves, cooked: 100 g · Hearts of palm, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Hearts of palm, canned for more protein and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    28 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.11 g
    2.52 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    4.62 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.4 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.62 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    0.13 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN257 mg
    426 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    177 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    58 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.26 mg
    3.13 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    38 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    7.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Hearts of palm, canned · Foodatron