Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked6
VS
Seaweed, wakame
Seaweed, wakame2

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Seaweed, wakame for more protein and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    45 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.11 g
    3.03 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    9.14 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    0.5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.65 g
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    0.13 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN257 mg
    872 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    50 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    150 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    2.18 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    55 mg
    107 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Seaweed, wakame · Foodatron