Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked
Amaranth leaves, cooked4
VS
Tomato paste
Tomato paste4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Tomato paste for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    82 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.11 g
    4.32 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    18.91 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    4.1 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    12.18 g
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    0.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    257 mg
    59 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    641 mg
    1014 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    36 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.26 mg
    2.98 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    21.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Tomato paste · Foodatron