Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked7
VS
Brown rice, long-grain, cooked
Brown rice, long-grain, cooked2

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Brown rice, long-grain, cooked for less sugar and less saturated fat.

Evenly matched on sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    123 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    2.74 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    25.58 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN6.7 g
    1.6 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.69 g
    0.24 gWIN
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    0.97 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    0.26 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    4 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN508 mg
    86 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN159 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    0.56 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN248 mg
    39 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN4.2 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Brown rice, long-grain, cooked · Foodatron