Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth grain, uncooked
Amaranth grain, uncooked3
VS
Wheat Bisks3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, less sugar and less sodium.

Pick Wheat Bisks for more fiber, less saturated fat and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    352.63 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    12 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    68 g
  • Fibermore is better
    6.7 g
    10 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.69 g
    4.4 g
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    0.6 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    112 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    508 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    159 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    7.61 mg
    11.84 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    248 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    4.2 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Wheat Bisks · Foodatron