Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked7
VS
Pancakes, plain
Pancakes, plain1

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Pancakes, plain for more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    227 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    6.4 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    28.3 g
  • Fibermore is better
    6.7 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.69 g
    —
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    9.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.46 g
    2.12 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    439 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN508 mg
    132 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    159 mg
    219 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    1.8 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN248 mg
    16 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN4.2 mg
    0.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Pancakes, plain · Foodatron