Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked7
VS
Sorghum, cooked
Sorghum, cooked2

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Amaranth grain, uncooked: 100 g · Sorghum, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Sorghum, cooked for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    329 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    10.62 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    72.09 g
  • Fibermore is better
    6.7 g
    6.7 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.69 g
    2.53 g
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    3.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    0.61 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN508 mg
    363 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN159 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    3.36 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN248 mg
    165 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN4.2 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Sorghum, cooked · Foodatron