Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked7
VS
Teff, cooked
Teff, cooked0

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    101 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    3.87 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    19.86 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN6.7 g
    2.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.69 g
    —
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    0.65 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    8 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN508 mg
    107 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN159 mg
    49 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    2.05 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN248 mg
    50 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    4.2 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Teff, cooked · Foodatron