Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked9
VS
Waffles, plain
Waffles, plain1

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 9–1 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 9 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Waffles, plain for more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    285 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    6.47 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    42.98 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN6.7 g
    2.2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.69 g
    4.91 g
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    9.7 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.46 g
    1.53 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    638 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN508 mg
    125 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    159 mg
    308 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    5.61 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN248 mg
    23 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN4.2 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Waffles, plain · Foodatron