Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked6
VS
Whole-wheat flour
Whole-wheat flour4

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Whole-wheat flour for more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    332 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    9.61 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    74.48 g
  • Fibermore is better
    6.7 g
    13.1 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.69 g
    1.02 gWIN
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    1.95 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    0.43 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN508 mg
    394 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN159 mg
    33 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    3.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN248 mg
    117 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN4.2 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Whole-wheat flour · Foodatron