Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Anchovies, canned Leader
Anchovies, canned4
VS
Chum salmon, cooked
Chum salmon, cooked3

Anchovies, canned leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Anchovies, canned: 100 g · Chum salmon, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Anchovies, canned comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Anchovies, canned for more protein, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chum salmon, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    210 kcal
    154 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.89 g
    25.82 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    9.71 g
    4.83 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.2 g
    1.08 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3668 mg
    64 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    544 mg
    550 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN232 mg
    14 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN4.63 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN69 mg
    28 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Anchovies, canned vs Chum salmon, cooked · Foodatron