Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Anchovies, canned Leader
Anchovies, canned5
VS
Cusk, cooked
Cusk, cooked1

Anchovies, canned leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Anchovies, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Anchovies, canned for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Cusk, cooked for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    210 kcal
    112 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN28.89 g
    24.35 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    9.71 g
    0.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.2 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    3668 mg
    40 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN544 mg
    503 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN232 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN4.63 mg
    1.06 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN69 mg
    40 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Anchovies, canned vs Cusk, cooked · Foodatron