Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron

Cuttlefish, cooked leads 8–0 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    13.76 g
    20.56 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.04 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.62 g
    0.89 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.05 g
    0.15 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    1746.67 mg
    470.89 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    259.05 mg
    403.16 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    110.48 mg
    113.92 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.2 mg
    6.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    32.86 mg
    37.97 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    5.38 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Anchovies, canned vs Cuttlefish, cooked · Foodatron