Cuttlefish, cooked leads 8–0 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie
Both foods compared at 100 kcal.
The verdict
Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 8 nutrient match-ups.
Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.
Evenly matched on fiber.
Head-to-head
- Energy100 kcal100 kcal
- Proteinmore is better13.76 g20.56 gWIN
- Carbohydrate0 g1.04 g
- Fibermore is better0 g0 g
- Total sugarsless is better0 g—
- Total fat4.62 g0.89 g
- Saturated fatless is better1.05 g0.15 gWIN
- Sodiumless is better1746.67 mg470.89 mgWIN
- Potassiummore is better259.05 mg403.16 mgWIN
- Calciummore is better110.48 mg113.92 mgWIN
- Ironmore is better2.2 mg6.86 mgWIN
- Magnesiummore is better32.86 mg37.97 mgWIN
- Vitamin Cmore is better0 mg5.38 mgWIN
- Vitamin Dmore is better——
Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

