Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Anchovies, canned
Anchovies, canned1
VS
Whelk, cooked Leader
Whelk, cooked7

Whelk, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Whelk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Anchovies, canned for more calcium.

Pick Whelk, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    210 kcal
    275 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.89 g
    47.68 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    15.52 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    9.71 g
    0.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.2 g
    0.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3668 mg
    412 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    544 mg
    694 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN232 mg
    113 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    4.63 mg
    10.06 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    69 mg
    172 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    6.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Anchovies, canned vs Whelk, cooked · Foodatron