Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apple, raw Leader
Apple, raw5
VS
Maraschino cherries
Maraschino cherries3

Apple, raw leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Apple, raw: 100 g · Maraschino cherries: 100 g.

The verdict

Apple, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apple, raw for more protein, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Maraschino cherries for more fiber, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    57 kcal
    165 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.28 g
    0.22 g
  • Carbohydrate
    13.6 g
    41.97 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.4 g
    3.2 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN10.04 g
    38.77 g
  • Total fat
    0.15 g
    0.21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.04 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    4 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN100 mg
    21 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    6 mg
    54 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.13 mg
    0.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN5 mg
    4 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apple, raw vs Maraschino cherries · Foodatron