Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apple, raw Leader
Apple, raw5
VS
Maraschino cherries
Maraschino cherries3

Apple, raw leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Apple, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apple, raw for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Maraschino cherries for less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.49 g
    0.13 g
  • Carbohydrate
    23.86 g
    25.44 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.21 g
    1.94 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN17.61 g
    23.5 g
  • Total fat
    0.26 g
    0.13 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.02 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    3.51 mg
    2.42 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN175.44 mg
    12.73 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10.53 mg
    32.73 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.23 mg
    0.26 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN8.77 mg
    2.42 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apple, raw vs Maraschino cherries · Foodatron