Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apple, raw
Apple, raw2
VS
Plums, canned in juice Leader
Plums, canned in juice6

Plums, canned in juice leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided

Apple, raw: 100 g · Plums, canned in juice: 100 g.

The verdict

Plums, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apple, raw for more fiber and less sugar.

Pick Plums, canned in juice for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    57 kcal
    58 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.28 g
    0.51 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    13.6 g
    15.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.4 g
    0.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN10.04 g
    14.22 g
  • Total fat
    0.15 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    2 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    100 mg
    154 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    6 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.13 mg
    0.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    5 mg
    8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    2.8 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apple, raw vs Plums, canned in juice · Foodatron