Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, dried Leader
Apples, dried7
VS
Apples, canned
Apples, canned3

Apples, dried leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Apples, dried comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, dried for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Apples, canned for less sugar, less sodium and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.38 g
    0.27 g
  • Carbohydrate
    27.12 g
    25.13 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN3.58 g
    2.99 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    23.53 g
    22.15 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.13 g
    0.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.02 g
    0.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    35.8 mg
    4.48 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN185.19 mg
    104.48 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    5.76 mg
    5.97 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.58 mg
    0.36 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN6.58 mg
    4.48 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.6 mg
    0.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, dried vs Apples, canned · Foodatron