Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked3
VS
Arugula, raw Leader
Arugula, raw4

Arugula, raw leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Arrowhead, cooked: 100 g · Arugula, raw: 100 g.

The verdict

Arugula, raw comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Arugula, raw for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    25 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    2.58 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    3.65 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    1.6 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    2.05 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.66 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    254 mg
    27 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    369 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    160 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.21 mg
    1.46 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    47 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    15 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Arugula, raw · Foodatron