Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked2
VS
Beet greens, cooked Leader
Beet greens, cooked5

Beet greens, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beet greens, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein and less sodium.

Pick Beet greens, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    27 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    2.57 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    5.46 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.6 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.03 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN254 mg
    477 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    881 mg
    909 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    114 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.21 mg
    1.9 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    49 mg
    68 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    24.9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Beet greens, cooked · Foodatron