Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked4
VS
Black olives, canned
Black olives, canned3

Arrowhead, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Black olives, canned for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    81 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    0.97 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    5.61 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    6.87 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.91 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN254 mg
    735 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    9 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    94 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.21 mg
    3.32 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    4 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    1.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Black olives, canned · Foodatron