Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked4
VS
Dandelion greens, cooked
Dandelion greens, cooked3

Arrowhead, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Arrowhead, cooked: 100 g · Dandelion greens, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Dandelion greens, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    33 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    2 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    6.4 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.62 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN254 mg
    280 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    232 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    140 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.21 mg
    1.8 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    24 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    18 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Dandelion greens, cooked · Foodatron