Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked0
VS
Garden cress, raw Leader
Garden cress, raw7

Garden cress, raw leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Garden cress, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Garden cress, raw for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    5.76 g
    8.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    20.69 g
    17.19 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    3.44 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    13.75 g
  • Total fat
    0.13 g
    2.19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    325.64 mg
    43.75 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    1129.49 mg
    1893.75 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    8.97 mg
    253.13 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.55 mg
    4.06 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    62.82 mg
    118.75 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.38 mg
    215.63 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Garden cress, raw · Foodatron