Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked2
VS
Okra, cooked Leader
Okra, cooked5

Okra, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Okra, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more potassium and more iron.

Pick Okra, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    5.76 g
    8.5 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    20.69 g
    20.5 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    11.36 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    10.91 g
  • Total fat
    0.13 g
    0.95 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.2 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    325.64 mg
    27.27 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN1129.49 mg
    613.64 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    8.97 mg
    350 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.55 mg
    1.27 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    62.82 mg
    163.64 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.38 mg
    74.09 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Okra, cooked · Foodatron