Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked3
VS
Okra, raw Leader
Okra, raw4

Okra, raw leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Okra, raw comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Okra, raw for less sodium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    33 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    1.93 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    7.45 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    3.2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.48 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.03 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    254 mg
    7 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    299 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    82 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.21 mg
    0.62 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    49 mg
    57 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Okra, raw · Foodatron