Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked5
VS
Straw mushrooms, canned
Straw mushrooms, canned2

Arrowhead, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Straw mushrooms, canned for more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    32 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    3.83 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    4.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN254 mg
    384 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    78 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.21 mg
    1.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    7 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Straw mushrooms, canned · Foodatron