Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked5
VS
Sweet corn, canned
Sweet corn, canned2

Arrowhead, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Arrowhead, cooked: 100 g · Sweet corn, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Sweet corn, canned for less sodium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    72 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    1.74 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    18.13 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    1.2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.23 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    254 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    134 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN7 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.21 mg
    0.38 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    17 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    4.6 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Sweet corn, canned · Foodatron