Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked2
VS
Taro shoots, cooked Leader
Taro shoots, cooked5

Taro shoots, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Taro shoots, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein and more magnesium.

Pick Taro shoots, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN5.76 g
    5.21 g
  • Carbohydrate
    20.69 g
    22.86 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.13 g
    0.57 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    325.64 mg
    14.29 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    1129.49 mg
    2457.14 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    8.97 mg
    100 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.55 mg
    2.93 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN62.82 mg
    57.14 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.38 mg
    135 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Taro shoots, cooked · Foodatron