Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked6
VS
Tomato sauce, canned
Tomato sauce, canned1

Arrowhead, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Tomato sauce, canned for more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    71 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    2.22 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    13.94 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    0.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    4 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN254 mg
    381 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    192 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    13 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.21 mg
    0.91 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    14 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.3 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Tomato sauce, canned · Foodatron