Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked4
VS
Winter squash, cooked
Winter squash, cooked3

Arrowhead, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Winter squash, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    37 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    0.89 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    8.85 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    2.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.3 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.35 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    254 mg
    237 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    241 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.21 mg
    0.44 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    13 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    1.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Winter squash, cooked · Foodatron