Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowroot flour
Arrowroot flour3
VS
Farro, cooked Leader
Farro, cooked5

Farro, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Arrowroot flour: 100 g · Farro, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Farro, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowroot flour for less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Farro, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    357 kcal
    132 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.3 g
    5.71 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    88.15 g
    27.6 g
  • Fibermore is better
    3.4 g
    4.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.07 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.83 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.02 g
    0.08 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    8 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    11 mg
    164 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN40 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.33 mg
    1.76 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    48 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowroot flour vs Farro, cooked · Foodatron