Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowroot flour
Arrowroot flour1
VS
Graham crackers Leader
Graham crackers7

Graham crackers leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Graham crackers comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowroot flour for less sodium.

Pick Graham crackers for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    357 kcal
    386 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.3 g
    5.71 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    88.15 g
    77.96 g
  • Fibermore is better
    3.4 g
    5.7 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    22.86 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    5.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.02 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    629 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    11 mg
    171 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    40 mg
    429 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.33 mg
    3.09 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    56 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowroot flour vs Graham crackers · Foodatron