Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowroot flour
Arrowroot flour3
VS
Millet, cooked Leader
Millet, cooked4

Millet, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Arrowroot flour: 100 g · Millet, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Millet, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowroot flour for more fiber, less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Millet, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on sodium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    357 kcal
    119 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.3 g
    3.51 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    88.15 g
    23.67 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN3.4 g
    1.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.13 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    1 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.02 g
    0.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    2 mg
    2 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    11 mg
    62 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN40 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.33 mg
    0.63 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    44 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowroot flour vs Millet, cooked · Foodatron