Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowroot flour
Arrowroot flour2
VS
Sorghum, cooked Leader
Sorghum, cooked5

Sorghum, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sorghum, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowroot flour for less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Sorghum, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on sodium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    357 kcal
    329 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.3 g
    10.62 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    88.15 g
    72.09 g
  • Fibermore is better
    3.4 g
    6.7 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    2.53 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    3.46 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.02 g
    0.61 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    2 mg
    2 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    11 mg
    363 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN40 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.33 mg
    3.36 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    165 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowroot flour vs Sorghum, cooked · Foodatron