Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked
Bacon, cooked2
VS
Beef shank, cooked Leader
Beef shank, cooked4

Beef shank, cooked leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef shank, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bacon, cooked for more protein and more potassium.

Pick Beef shank, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    548 kcal
    201 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN35.73 g
    33.68 g
  • Carbohydrate
    1.35 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    43.27 g
    6.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    14.19 g
    2.29 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    2193 mg
    64 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN539 mg
    447 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    3.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    30 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Beef shank, cooked · Foodatron