Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked
Bacon, cooked3
VS
Lamb loin chop, cooked Leader
Lamb loin chop, cooked4

Lamb loin chop, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Lamb loin chop, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bacon, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Lamb loin chop, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    548 kcal
    315 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN35.73 g
    23.43 g
  • Carbohydrate
    1.35 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    43.27 g
    23.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    14.19 g
    11.96 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    2193 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN539 mg
    159 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    23 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    2.05 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN30 mg
    19 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Lamb loin chop, cooked · Foodatron