Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked
Bacon, cooked3
VS
Lamb shoulder, cooked Leader
Lamb shoulder, cooked4

Lamb shoulder, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Lamb shoulder, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bacon, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Lamb shoulder, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    6.52 g
    7.9 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0.25 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    7.9 g
    7.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.59 g
    3.57 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    400.18 mg
    14.29 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN98.36 mg
    41.18 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    1.82 mg
    7.56 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.27 mg
    0.59 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN5.47 mg
    5.04 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Lamb shoulder, cooked · Foodatron