Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked
Bacon, cooked0
VS
Moose, cooked Leader
Moose, cooked8

Moose, cooked leads 8–0 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Moose, cooked comes out ahead, winning 8 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Moose, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    6.52 g
    21.84 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0.25 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    7.9 g
    0.72 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.59 g
    0.22 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    400.18 mg
    51.49 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    98.36 mg
    249.25 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    1.82 mg
    4.48 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.27 mg
    3.15 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    5.47 mg
    17.91 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    3.73 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Moose, cooked · Foodatron