Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked
Bacon, cooked0
VS
Pork chop, raw Leader
Pork chop, raw7

Pork chop, raw leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Pork chop, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Pork chop, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    6.52 g
    10.9 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0.25 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    7.9 g
    5.94 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.59 g
    1.27 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    400.18 mg
    30.11 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    98.36 mg
    181.18 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    1.82 mg
    13.44 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.27 mg
    0.32 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    5.47 mg
    12.37 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Pork chop, raw · Foodatron