Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked Leader
Bacon, cooked5
VS
Beef salami, cooked
Beef salami, cooked3

Bacon, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Bacon, cooked: 100 g · Beef salami, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Bacon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bacon, cooked for more protein, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Beef salami, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    548 kcal
    261 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN35.73 g
    12.6 g
  • Carbohydrate
    1.35 g
    1.9 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    1.5 g
  • Total fat
    43.27 g
    22.2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    14.19 g
    9.87 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    2193 mg
    1140 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN539 mg
    188 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN10 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.49 mg
    2.2 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN30 mg
    13 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Beef salami, cooked · Foodatron