Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Barbecue sauce
Barbecue sauce2
VS
Chili con carne with beans Leader
Chili con carne with beans7

Chili con carne with beans leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Barbecue sauce for less saturated fat and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    172 kcal
    107 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.82 g
    5.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    40.77 g
    13.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.9 g
    3.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    33.24 g
    1.87 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.63 g
    3.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    1.25 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    1027 mg
    449 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    232 mg
    264 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    33 mg
    33 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.64 mg
    1.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    13 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.6 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Barbecue sauce vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron