Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Barbecue sauce
Barbecue sauce2
VS
Chili con carne with beans Leader
Chili con carne with beans8

Chili con carne with beans leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Barbecue sauce for less saturated fat and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.48 g
    5.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    23.7 g
    12.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.52 g
    3.08 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    19.33 g
    1.75 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.37 g
    3.24 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    1.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    597.09 mg
    419.63 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    134.88 mg
    246.73 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    19.19 mg
    30.84 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.37 mg
    1.25 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    7.56 mg
    26.17 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.35 mg
    0.19 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Barbecue sauce vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron