Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked4
VS
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Beef eye of round, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    171 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    29.79 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    4.83 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    1.66 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    66 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    408 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    16 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.71 mg
    1.86 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef eye of round, cooked · Foodatron