Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked4
VS
Beef porterhouse steak, cooked
Beef porterhouse steak, cooked3

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Beef porterhouse steak, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Beef porterhouse steak, cooked for more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    224 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    25.51 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    12.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN3.59 g
    4.35 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    301 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN7 mg
    6 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    3.24 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    25 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef porterhouse steak, cooked · Foodatron