Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Beef round, cooked Leader
Beef round, cooked4

Beef round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef bottom round, cooked: 100 g · Beef round, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Beef round, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    163 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    30.08 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10 g
    4.79 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    1.84 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    264 mg
    378 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    16 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    2.9 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Beef round, cooked · Foodatron